Post by The Management on Apr 3, 2024 8:17:27 GMT
The Express produced on 31 March 2024 an article by David Walker Politics reporter
The article is OK But first reading some things are not quite clear
Within 20 min a shit storm start about money being spent, Salmond's spending
This is a very very simplified of what should be happening
Alex Salmond was charged with offenses,
whether you like AS or Not doesn't matter One Iota,
He was cleared of ALL CHARGES Oh but, The Not Proven one, The Prosecution failed to make (Prove) it's case If some one can't understand that try sounding the words
AS Has already received £500,000 in costs that is some of what it cost him to defend himself of the himself of the charges
Bear in mind had he not been charged ,he would have had to fork out Half a Million of his money
The article is clear in who the case is against Sturgeon Lloyd & Evans These are individuals Not Scottish Government, not the SNP Where get a bit confusing is
Sturgeon salary would be paid by the SNP, they would be acting as a Paymaster at that level I would doubt they would have a liability
Lloyd worked for the SNP and then didn't she went on to work for the SG her conduct in that period needs a good looking into,did she break the rules in any way,I believe that being the case the SG I believe has a liability, it also lands in the SNP lab if knowing they instructed a wrongful act Two wrong just make it worse that's like separating porage
Evans,That more like Lloyd,except She only worked for SG by is linked to WN (London) that relationship London & Edinburgh needs "a looking at" over all irregularities
He is suing for £3m ( one Million each) which sounds logical but it's also variable at the moment the top line all in it is £3m plus there will be costs if the court approve them
And then along comes HY He'll sort
Aye Right, some one in the SNP sought legal advise, that is down to the SNP, If it was legal instrution on behave of the SG, who was it to protect , Which of the 3,or was it all 3
That bill should be paid by the SNP
AS had to pay his bill
HY should not even think of using Public Money to pay their created bad mis-management, they want to pay See if the members will cough up, after all the SNP are an Unincorporated Association
I'd suggest HY goes & has a look at the bank balance
It's worth point out If you're owed money from the SNP ,you could sue them for that money,and cite fraudulently trading in that action HOWEVER that's not strictly true, the name of what the SNP are scuppers it a touch
The case would be in a style as xxxxxxxxx -V- Humza Yousaf,Nicola Sturgeon ,Shona Robinson & others
This was Nicola's Cunning Plan because SHE wanted to get rid of Salmond
archive.ph/Tfq3c
The article is OK But first reading some things are not quite clear
Within 20 min a shit storm start about money being spent, Salmond's spending
This is a very very simplified of what should be happening
Alex Salmond was charged with offenses,
whether you like AS or Not doesn't matter One Iota,
He was cleared of ALL CHARGES Oh but, The Not Proven one, The Prosecution failed to make (Prove) it's case If some one can't understand that try sounding the words
AS Has already received £500,000 in costs that is some of what it cost him to defend himself of the himself of the charges
Bear in mind had he not been charged ,he would have had to fork out Half a Million of his money
The article is clear in who the case is against Sturgeon Lloyd & Evans These are individuals Not Scottish Government, not the SNP Where get a bit confusing is
Sturgeon salary would be paid by the SNP, they would be acting as a Paymaster at that level I would doubt they would have a liability
Lloyd worked for the SNP and then didn't she went on to work for the SG her conduct in that period needs a good looking into,did she break the rules in any way,I believe that being the case the SG I believe has a liability, it also lands in the SNP lab if knowing they instructed a wrongful act Two wrong just make it worse that's like separating porage
Evans,That more like Lloyd,except She only worked for SG by is linked to WN (London) that relationship London & Edinburgh needs "a looking at" over all irregularities
He is suing for £3m ( one Million each) which sounds logical but it's also variable at the moment the top line all in it is £3m plus there will be costs if the court approve them
And then along comes HY He'll sort
Aye Right, some one in the SNP sought legal advise, that is down to the SNP, If it was legal instrution on behave of the SG, who was it to protect , Which of the 3,or was it all 3
That bill should be paid by the SNP
AS had to pay his bill
HY should not even think of using Public Money to pay their created bad mis-management, they want to pay See if the members will cough up, after all the SNP are an Unincorporated Association
I'd suggest HY goes & has a look at the bank balance
It's worth point out If you're owed money from the SNP ,you could sue them for that money,and cite fraudulently trading in that action HOWEVER that's not strictly true, the name of what the SNP are scuppers it a touch
The case would be in a style as xxxxxxxxx -V- Humza Yousaf,Nicola Sturgeon ,Shona Robinson & others
This was Nicola's Cunning Plan because SHE wanted to get rid of Salmond
archive.ph/Tfq3c